A Painless Guide to the Difference between ISO 9001 and IATF 16949
ISO/TS vs (ISO & IATF ) Details IATF This comparison matrix can be used by An organization as a gap analysis for their QMS. This is a + page document. If it was published on Amazon, the price would be hundreds of dollars. Requirement ISO/TS Reference ASB Reference ASC Reference Impact Vs. AS Foreword Technical Specification QMS requirements for Automotive Standardizes QMS requirements for Aerospace Revised to ISO and Industry requirements None – TS was updated to ISO (June 15, ).
Because the automotive industry has changed in the last few years and there has been many technological advances and an increase for safety concerns, the changes of this new standard include solutions to recent problems and concerns in the industry. Some of the main changes include:. The new IATF includes specific requirements to address risk management. They aim at identifying and mitigation risk to reduce failures in the development of new programs and to enhance the execution of planned activities.
Also, the new standard requires organizations to have processes that will ensure product safety through the entire lifecycle of products. This standard clearly differentiates customer requirements from Customer-specific requirements CSR to avoid misunderstanding and specifies the procedures for addressing them. IATF includes improvement of the traceability requirements of products to support regulatory changes that apply to the industry. Specific requirements for products with embedded software.
With technology advances, electronics and software are now incorporated into vehicles, which is something that did not happen before; thus the standard now explicitly addresses these electronics and software systems that are being embedded into vehicles. The standard introduces requirements related to the warranty management process that includes procedures to address No Trouble Found NTF.
The standard requires that organizations ensure conformance of products, processes and services throughout their supply chain. Hence, organizations must manage conformity issues across their supply chain. Organizations are required to implement corporate responsibility policies and initiatives that address bribery and other ethical issues. This standard is fully aligned with ISO and it needs to be implemented to complement it.
IATF is not an independent quality management standard, thus those organizations seeking to be certified with this standard, also need to comply with all ISO requirements. These are the main changes included in IATF Those organizations required to transition to it, such as suppliers that manufacture parts for the industry, must examine it carefully and fully understand all its requirements.
The transition process must be completed by September 14 Save how to breed a air name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Leave how to make your chin thinner Reply Cancel reply.
Key Focus Areas of ISO 9001 and IATF 16949
IATF is a technical specification aimed at the development of a quality management system which provides for continual improvement, emphasizing defect prevention and the reduction of variation and waste in the automotive industry supply chain and assembly process. It is based on the ISO standard and the first edition was published in June as ISO/TS This is an important difference between ISO and IATF (which we will touch on later in this article). That is, the requirements of IATF are supplemental to the ISO which forms the base requirements for any quality management system. Let’s dig into the scope of IATF requirements. QS is now replaced by ISO/TS ISO/TS is an interpretation agreed upon by major automotive manufacturers (American and European manufacturers); the latest version is based on ISO The emphasis on a process approach is stronger than in ISO ISO/TS contains the full text of ISO and.
IATF was developed originally by a group of manufacturers to provide better products to automotive consumers.
By contrast, the scope of ISO is much broader, including over one million companies spanning various industries. Both standards, however, aim to improve the quality of a product with a customer focus. In what follows, you will learn:. While you might think that ISO and IATF are exclusive to each other, it turns out considerable overlap is seen within the requirements of their criteria.
In many cases, a company held under both guidelines, like a one in the automotive sector, will need to satisfy the requirements of each. Because ISO is a generic set of requirements intended to apply to any organization despite size or type of product, service, or process, it basically requires two things:. The organization needs to show it can consistently provide satisfying products and services to customers while meeting regulations. It must also aim to enhance satisfaction through continual processes of improvement while conformity is assured.
These requirements are defined under 8 sections for implementing a satisfactory quality management system. In comparison, the IATF is more specific with its conditions since it narrows its focus on producers in the automotive industry specifically.
The IATF applies to automotive producers with the goal of improving customer experience through quality management principles. That is, the requirements of IATF are supplemental to the ISO which forms the base requirements for any quality management system. And, both emphasize the following focus areas: organizational context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
Under leadership, both establish the need for commitment as well as clearly outlined policies, organizational roles, and final authorities. The planning section outlines how actions address opportunities as well as risks. There are clear quality objectives and plans to achieve them through systematic changes. To consider support, both standards place a heavy burden on companies to achieve resources, competence, and awareness.
This means training, audits, and even employee empowerment. Here we include conditions for products, services, and design and development. This means consideration of operational planning, manufacturing processes, design validation, prototype management, and outputs.
Monitoring, analysis, and measurement are key in the evaluation section of these standards. They demand an internal audit and management review for all products and processes. Finally, improvement deals with the issues of nonconformity and the need for corrective action to produce incremental change and advancement.
This means error-proofing and dealing with customer feedback and complaints. In essence, IATF is a quality management standard specifically for the automotive sector but still fulfills the basic criteria of ISO In fact, IATF was created to synchronize certification worldwide for all automotive supply chains and assessments.
As we have noted before, the conditions and criteria of IATF must be implemented in conjunction with ISO , making it a supplemental set of requirements. This signals an important difference between ISO and IATF even when both systems have the essential function of improving experiences, products, and processes.
While this introductory comparison is instructive for learning more about the structure, requirements, and goals of these two important sets of criteria, there may be a need to learn more from more experienced quality management professionals about the difference between ISO and IATF Contact Sync Resource today for a consultation on how you can meet quality standards, and see how we can improve your practices to stimulate constant and incremental improvement to satisfaction and services.
Company Contact. Email: contactus sync-resource. Quick Links. ISO IATF General Information. We're committed to your privacy.